830 0|aEssays on science, religion, law, literature and life.

I said that before I ended I would just touch on the question of classical education, and I will keep my word. Even if literature is to retain a large place in our education, yet Latin and Greek, say the friends of progress, will certainly have to go. Greek is the grand offender in the eyes of these gentlemen. The attackers of the established course of study think that against Greek, at any rate, they have irresistible arguments. Literature may perhaps be needed in education, they say; but why on earth should it be Greek literature? Why not French or German? Nay, "has not an Englishman models in his own literature of every kind of excellence?" As before, it is not on any weak pleadings of my own that I rely for convincing the gainsayers; it is on the constitution of human nature itself, and on the instinct of self-preservation in humanity. The instinct for beauty is set in human nature, as surely as the instinct for knowledge is set there, or the instinct for conduct. If the instinct for beauty is served by Greek literature and art as it is served by no other literature and art, we may trust to the instinct of self-preservation in humanity for keeping Greek as part of our culture. We may trust to it for even making the study of Greek more prevalent than it is now. Greek will come, I hope, some day to be studied more rationally than at present; but it will be increasingly studied as men increasingly feel the need in them for beauty, and how powerfully Greek art and Greek literature can serve this need. Women will again study Greek, as Lady Jane Grey did; I believe that in that chain of forts, with which the fair host of the Amazons are now engirdling our English universities, I find that here in America, in colleges like Smith College in Massachusetts, and Vassar College in the State of New York, and in the happy families of the mixed universities out West, they are studying it already.

Journal of Literature and Science

English Literature Essays Resources Links & Books

"Literature and Science" (Matthew Arnold [1882])

Literary criticism, as distinguished from scholarly research, is usually itself considered a form of literature. Some people find great critics as entertaining and stimulating as great poets, and theoretical treatises of literary aesthetics can be as exciting as novels. Aristotle, Longinus, and the Roman rhetorician and critic Quintilian are still read, although Renaissance critics like the once all-powerful Josephus Scaliger are forgotten by all but specialized scholars. Later critics, such as Poe, Sainte-Beuve, Taine, Vissarion Belinsky, Matthew Arnold, Walter Bagehot, Walter Pater, and George Saintsbury, are probably read more for themselves than for their literary judgments and for their general theorizing rather than for their applications (in the case of the first three, for instance, time has confounded almost all the evaluations they made of their contemporaries). The English critics have survived because they largely confined themselves to acknowledged masterpieces and general ideas. Perhaps literary criticism can really be read as a form of autobiography. Aestheticians of literature like I.A. Richards, Sir C.M. Bowra, Paul Valéry, Suzanne Langer, and Ernst Cassirer have had an influence beyond the narrow confines of literary scholarship and have played in our time something approaching the role of general philosophers. This has been true on the popular level as well. The Dane Georg Brandes, the Americans James Gibbons Huneker, H.L. Mencken, and Edmund Wilson — these men have been social forces in their day. Literary criticism can play its role in social change. In Japan, the overthrow of the shogunate, the restoration of the emperor, and the profound change in the Japanese social sensibility begins with the literary criticism of Moto-ori Norinaga (1730-1801). The nineteenth-century revolution in theology resulted from the convergence of Darwinian theories of evolution and the technical and historical criticism of the Bible that scholars had undertaken. For many modern intellectuals, the literary quarterlies and weeklies, with their tireless discussions of the spiritual significance and formal characteristics of everything from the greatest masterpiece to the most ephemeral current production, can be said to have filled the place of religion, both as rite and dogma.

Volume 8, Issue 1 (2015) | Journal of Literature and Science

Hippolyte Taine, the nineteenth-century French critic, evolved an ecological theory of literature. He looked first and foremost to the national characteristics of western European literatures, and he found the source of these characteristics in the climate and soil of each respective nation. His (5 vols., 1863-1869) is an extensive elaboration of these ideas. It is doubtful that anyone today would agree with the simplistic terms in which Taine states his thesis. It is obvious that Russian literature differs from English or French from German. English books are written by Englishmen, their scenes are commonly laid in England, they are usually about Englishmen and they are designed to be read by Englishmen — at least in the first instance. But modern civilization becomes more and more a world civilization, wherein works of all peoples flow into a general fund of literature. It is not unusual to read a novel by a Japanese author one week and one by a black writer from West Africa the next. Writers are themselves affected by this cross-fertilization. Certainly, the work of the great nineteenth-century Russian novelists has had more influence on twentieth-century American writers than has the work of their own literary ancestors. Poetry does not circulate so readily, because catching its true significance in translation is so very difficult to accomplish. Nevertheless, for the past hundred years or so, the influence of French poetry upon all the literatures of the civilized world has not just been important, it has been preeminent. The tendentious elements of literature — propaganda for race, nation, or religion — have been more and more eroded in this process of wholesale cultural exchange.

Dawson, Gowan. “Literature and Science under the Microscope.” Journal of Victorian Culture 11 (2006): 301–315. DOI:
Reviews the book

Dream Essays: Custom Term Paper and Essay Writing Firm

And how do you kick these people out of SF? Ignore them. Don't let them guest-blog or write articles. Don't interview them or review their books. Don't let them be on panels at conventions. Don't give them a platform to express their hate and bizarre world views, which in any event have absolutely nothing to do with SF literature. Spotting a bigot is not rocket science. When a person obsessively (daily to weekly) writes about a group they identify as gay, female, white, black, etc., and that rhetoric is negative about that group 100% of the time, that is a bigot. They have no place in SF. Ignore their excuses, ignore their mitigations, ignore their explanations, their logic. Forget their politics, their race, their gender. Use simple principle and look at the odds a group - any group - defined by what they were the day they were born will come up short 100% of the time. It is impossible for that to happen. That only happens in a sick and delusional crucible of hatred and disdain, bias and prejudice. And by the way, it would help to stop nominating such morons for SF's literary awards.

Mysteries in the Classroom. essays in science and literature ABOUT thesis oxford dictionary US.

Essays | Repository of Free Essays

A collection of some of Levine’s essays, including new work as well as some articles published after 1980. Includes wide-ranging essays on positivism, science and religion, the methodology of literature and science studies, and a highly influential essay, “George Eliot’s Hypothesis of Reality.”

Impact of Social Sciences - Reading List: The role of arts and literature in developing creative societies #LSELitFest

The Web of Science Journal Selection Process - …

The constant disingenuousness is in asserting "women" is interchangeable with "intersectional queer culture." Bradford unintentionally reveals the Orwellian semantics in play by writing "if women keep writing the kind of science fiction they want to see more of, and keep calling it science fiction, the room for that kind of science fiction expands within the genre." Replace "women" with "supremacist queer culture" and realize what she's really saying is if I keep calling a donkey a horse long enough, it'll run in the Kentucky Derby. Of course it'll never win and so there'll be even more calls for segregated anthologies because men are rejecting women when the simple truth is the mainstream public has no interest in the forgettable and bizarre SF represented by the . The whole idea is as goofy as calling a lesbian music festival the Billboard Awards and then claiming the reason the festival exists in the first place is because the mainstream doesn't like music performed by women. The reality is that women in music are doing just fine and so are women SF authors who put the literature before a heavily politicized version of shiny bent gender and a hysteric phobia of straight white men.