Importance of literature vs science essay
film critical essays Importance Of Literature Vs Science Essay
But in reality, whatever may be true about democracy andtotalitarianism, it is not true that they are the same. It wouldnot be true, even if British democracy were incapable of evolvingbeyond its present stage. The whole conception of the militarisedcontinental state, with its secret police, its censored literatureand its conscript labour, is utterly different from that of theloose maritime democracy, with its slums and unemployment, itsstrikes and party politics. It is the difference between land powerand sea power, between cruelty and inefficiency, between lying andself-deception, between the SS man and the rent-collector. And inchoosing between them one chooses not so much on the strength ofwhat they now are as of what they are capable of becoming. But in asense it is irrelevant whether democracy, at its higher or at itslowest, is "better" than totalitarianism. To decide that one wouldhave to have access to absolute standards. The only question thatmatters is where one's real sympathies will lie when the pinchcomes. The intellectuals who are so fond of balancing democracyagainst totalitarianism and "proving" that one is as bad as theother are simply frivolous people who have never been shoved upagainst realities. They show the same shallow misunderstanding ofFascism now, when they are beginning to flirt with it, as a year ortwo ago, when they were squealing against it. The question is not,"Can you make out a debating-society 'case' in favour of Hitler?"The question is, "Do you genuinely accept that case? Are youwilling to submit to Hitler's rule? Do you want to see Englandconquered, or don't you?" It would be better to be sure on thatpoint before frivolously siding with the enemy. For there is nosuch thing as neutrality in war; in practice one must help one sideor the other.
The Importance of Literature vs. Science Essay - 1199 …
Miller's books are published by the Obelisk Press in Paris. Whatwill happen to the Obelisk Press, now that war has broken out andJack Kathane, the publisher, is dead, I do not know, but at anyrate the books are still procurable. I earnestly counsel anyone whohas not done so to read at least TROPIC OF CANCER. With a littleingenuity, or by paying a little over the published price, you canget hold of it, and even if parts of it disgust you, it will stickin your memory. It is also an 'important' book, in a sensedifferent from the sense in which that word is generally used. As arule novels are spoken of as 'important' when they are either a'terrible indictment' of something or other or when they introducesome technical innovation. Neither of these applies to TROPIC OFCANCER. Its importance is merely symptomatic. Here in my opinion isthe only imaginative prose-writer of the slightest value who hasappeared among the English-speaking races for some years past. Evenif that is objected to as an overstatement, it will probably beadmitted that Miller is a writer out of the ordinary, worth morethan a single glance; and after all, he is a completely negative,unconstructive, amoral writer, a mere Jonah, a passive acceptor ofevil, a sort of Whitman among the corpses. Symptomatically, that ismore significant than the mere fact that five thousand novels arepublished in England every year and four thousand nine hundred ofthem are tripe. It is a demonstration of the impossibility of anymajor literature until the world has shaken itself into its newshape.